Process Flow, Before Sales 2.0 – 10 Ideas To Improve Productivity Without Technology

Process Flow Before Sales 2.0

Process Flow B4 Sales 2.0

Here are some fun stats… In 2009, on average, sales representatives achieved only 52% of quota, sales departments achieved only 79% of plan and most companies do not plan to invest in more sales training or technology in 2010.  To add to the fun, most companies plan to raise sales quotas in 2010 by 10% or higher. (Source: CSO Insight’s 16th annual, Sales Effectiveness Research Project, 3,000 participants.)

Yikes! I learned about these statistics last week in an excellent webinar called “Strategies for Sales Success in 2010”, which was facilitated by Jim Dickie, the Managing Partner from CSO Insights and Gerhard Gschwandtner, the President of Selling Power magazine.

The three key messages from the webinar were:

  • From 2007 to 2009, sales teams have progressively performed worse against achievement of quota and achievement of plan.
  • Most companies plan to raise quotas in 2010.
  • Companies that invest in sales 2.0 technologies will achieve better performance than companies that don’t. They defined Sales 2.0 as “the use of sales practices enabled by technology to improve”. (Check out my earlier blog post titled, “Sales 2.0, a buzzword that every sales leader must know”.)

While the webinar was in session, we were encouraged to text message questions and comments. About 30 minutes in, I sent the following note, “This is great information. But, shouldn’t companies define their current and future state processes first, before adding technology.” Gerhard saw my note, and read the question to the webinar audience. Jim Dickie responded, that yes, companies should do a process audit before adding technology.

I am a huge fan of technology and my husband often calls me a geek (in a loving way, of course), but I strongly believe in “process flow, before sales 2.0”. And, perhaps it’s my Six Sigma Greenbelt talking, but we need to understand the root causes of productivity issues, before we can look for solutions.

How can you help reverse the challenging, sales attainment trends from 2009? How can you drive better sales productivity without jumping to a technology solution? Here are 10 ideas:

  1. Become an expert in your “current state”: considering people, processes, technology, data and the work environment. Get 360 feedback to truly understand what’s working and where the roadblocks are.
  2. Prioritize the work. Start with and spend the most time on the best sales opportunities.. usually the 20% that drive 80% of your sales.  Ask your friends in Marketing to help with “sales modeling”. (Check out the High Probability Selling methodology.)
  3. Stop work that does not directly contribute to sales achievement. How many cross-functional or strategic projects are sales personnel focusing on in addition to generating sales?
  4. Consider work schedules. Are sales reps selling at the best, most productive times, or do they have a standard 9 – 5 schedule, Monday- Friday?
  5. Ramp up sales coaching and skills development. Require sales supervisors to be more visible and hands on. (Check out “Sales Manager Effectiveness, the Key To Sales Productivity“)
  6. Examine sales compensation plans. Do they need a makeover? Are they driving the correct behaviors?
  7. Evaluate whether noise, interruptions and/or the seating arrangements are negatively impacting productivity.
  8. Empower sales managers and reps to make more decisions. Remove the rubber stamps.
  9. Investigate the admin and customer service work that sales reps spend time on. Can work be delegated to other departments? Are there too many steps in existing processes? Find ways to streamline and speed up non-selling activities.
  10. Ensure that your sales policies are clearly documented, communicated and enforced. Without policies, Reps and managers will spend too much time dealing with “one offs” and adjustments.

What other ideas do you have for improving productivity, without jumping to a technology solution? Please add your comments….

Share This Post

5 comments on “Process Flow, Before Sales 2.0 – 10 Ideas To Improve Productivity Without Technology

  1. Thanks.

    Yeah, Justin in Australia has a pretty drastic plan for sales reps and their commissions!

    I have been following CSO survey for 5 years and participated in several. I am not sure of the sampling methodology- web based, ad hoc. but with 2,800 respondants, it would seem the results should be accurate.

    Of course when I quiz my IT, telecom buddies (Managers and Reps) they all say “everythings fine”, but then I go on LinkedIN and quickly sort out the sales reps at their firm who are gone…..(and my vendor buddy just got let go on Friday 1 year in a new territory start-up- ZIP sales. Zero, nada.). Needless to say there was ZERO sales 2.0 process, tools or anything there. SO after paying a senior guy $90K for 1 year, they let him go, only to hire another one from IBM, hoping he’ll bring in a “book of business”. (still no lead gen process yet, so he will fail too.) (so there is a basis for these CSO stats- someone has to be failing big time to drive only 51% quota success rate).

    As CSO states many reps are being carried in hopes things will rebound. MANY reps over 40 have NEVER had to cold call and prospect to the levels required to-day to fill funnels.

    The fact that CEOs and SVP Sales are raising the quotas, while maintaining the same headcount after 5 yrs of declining productivity and many of these same companies are NOT installing sales 2.0 tools. (ie basic leadgen, web 2.0 etc.). is a bit like the FORD Motor company in the 1920′s whne they refused to believe the MODEL T was a has been, GM was eating their lunch with segmented products (BUICK, etc) and HENRY had to shut down the factory for 1 year to retool.

    2 cts from Canada. (land of Gold)

    SA

      [Click to quote this in your comment]

  2. Raising quotas makes sense, of sorts.

    If the initial quota was $1 million and the actual income was $520K (52%)and you raise the quota to $2 million, then the new average income will be $1.04 million, right?

    As you said, get the process right and add technology that facilitates. The main problem is stinkin’ thinkin’, not the tools. Executive level cluelessness to what’s happening in the field. And it seems that the larger the organization, the further management is from battlefield.

    If sales is the heart and soul of an organization, why does the brain disenfranchise itself?

      [Click to quote this in your comment]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>